650 Group
  • Home
  • Programs
    • WLAN Infrastructure
    • Telecom Core Networks
    • Ethernet Switch Programs >
      • Ethernet Switch - Total
      • Ethernet Switch - Data Center
      • Ethernet Switch - Campus
      • Ethernet Switch - Carrier Ethernet
      • Campus Networks
      • Ethernet Switch - SMB
    • Application Delivery Controller (ADC)
    • Merchant Silicon in the Data Center
    • Market Intelligence Reports
    • Consumer IoT
    • Disaggregated Routing Report
    • Industrial Switching Report
    • Multi-Cloud Workloads Forecast and Research Report
    • Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Forecast and Research Report
    • Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Hyperscaler SWOT Report
  • News
    • Press Releases
  • Blog
  • About
  • Employment
  • Contact
  • Clients

650 Group Blog

View my profile on LinkedIn

Nokia Fixed Networks Group Counting on 25G PON

10/8/2020

0 Comments

 
Nokia reiterated its commitment to 25G PON in its two-day briefing with industry researchers this week.  It also shared some interesting commentary about is progress with Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) and its consumer Wi-Fi devices.  But, what makes Nokia’s 25G announcement so interesting is that there is significant controversy associated with the 25G standardization process; 50G PON is also in the race for standardization, too.  It seems that the world will split into two purchasing groups: Chinese and Western.  We think the fact that two purchasing groups will emerge is a material negative for the telecommunications industry and is a sign of things to come.  Nokia has decided to chart its own path, find partners, and make the best of this controversy.  Our view is that Nokia’s 25G PON offerings will see more demand than 50G PON in the upcoming years, and when 50G finally becomes necessary, Nokia can move to support it.

For background, in May 2020, Huawei announced to analysts that it is backing a 50G standards process, in cooperation with the ETSI.  Huawei calls its 50G development “F5G,” which stands for Fixed 5G.  It demonstrated over a video presentation an FPGA-based prototype, and it and explained that it expects this technology to be adopted first by the mobile infrastructure market for connecting RAN radio systems to baseband systems and for backhaul.  Then Huawei expects the market will develop for residential PON, and later for enterprise campus connectivity (to replace Ethernet switches).  Huawei explained that in February 2020, it has the support of Chinese operators, ETSI members in Switzerland, a European operator, Altice Portugal, and Chinese operators.

On the other hand, Nokia had developed a chipset that specifically supports both GPON and next generation PON technologies; it is called Quillion and has been available for nine months.  Nokia had consistently explained on several occasions in the past several months that during a February 2020 ITU meeting relating to 25G PON, 18 members of the ITU were in favor of initiating the 25G standardization project (including ATT, BT, Korea Telecom, nbn Co, Telecom Italy, SK Telecom, Telus etc).   However, there was a minority coalition led by operators and vendors from China that objected to the proposal on the grounds that 25G PON would pre-empt their futuristic vision of 50G PON.  This in turn resulted in no consensus being met.

In response, Nokia has worked with operators and suppliers interested in pursuing 25G PON in the near-term, which we interpret as the next 1-2 years.  This MSA (multi-source agreement) strategy is used by various groups in the technology industry when there is sufficient buying power to move ahead of (or in this case, without) standards ratification; we see if used frequently by hyperscalers when building their bleeding-edge data center infrastructures.  We understand that there are a handful of operators, including Chorus (New Zealand), Chungwa Telecom (Taiwan), and NBN (Australia) and several technology suppliers including AOI, MACOM, MaxLinear, Ciena, Tibit and others.  The MSA has a website with more information.
Picture
Nokia explains that 25G PON shares the same optical technologies as those used in Ethernet Switches that are common and used by data centers and campus switching environments.  Sharing common optical technologies with high volume data center deployments will reduce costs . Our view is that in a few years, data center switching demand for 25G optics will continue to rise, and this is perfect timing for Nokia and others who are going to use 25G for PON because the supply will be there and this technology will be mature and lower cost.

There’s one other thing to consider that pits Nokia against others.  It decided to develop its own semiconductors to power its infrastructure PON systems (OLTs).  Nokia’s chip system is called Quillion, and its introduction means it won’t be dependent upon OLT chip vendors.

​What’s even more interesting about this whole debate is just how future-looking it is.  PON has moved through two main generations, GPON (2.5 Gbps), 10 GPON (XGS and XGPON), and now we are talking about two different generations, 25G and 50G.  Huawei’s 50G “F5G” approach is a “if you can’t join ‘em, beat em” strategy, where Huawei will leverage its home market telecom operators’ volume and a few others to work outside its home territory.  Huawei will leverage this technology to three markets over time: 5G backhaul, residential PON and enterprise networking.  On the other hand, Nokia is taking matters into its own hands in that it has developed its own chips.  What’s happening now is not uncharted waters, but it is rare for the telecommunications industry to splinter into multiple buying groups – usually standards are developed and followed for the benefit of the industry.  This time, in the absence of standards, Nokia has forged on ahead on its own and its headstrong ways are likely to benefit it because many Western operators and now actively seeking to diversify away from Huawei in their procurement of fixed network equipment.  ​
0 Comments

huawei Provides 2020 meeting Update

5/19/2020

0 Comments

 
The big ideas unveiled at the conference were twofold.  First, Huawei is promoting worldwide open standards as a counter to the likelihood that if it gets cut off from US-influenced technology, it may have to create its own, non-standard technology.  Second, the company is promoting “F5G,” which is “fixed 5G,” or a global standard for Passive Optical Network (PON) technology that operates at as high as 50 Gbps and can be used for fixed broadband, optical LAN (Campus Networks), cellular backhaul/fronthaul, and even optical Access uses.  The company also discussed evolutions or themes discussed at previous events like HAS2019, such as mmWave, FDD+TDD integration, Control User Plane Separation (CUPS), and more generally, 5G.  Much to our surprise, the opening keynotes differed significantly from the previous year’s themes in that there was no discussion of the advancements the company was making in developing in-house semiconductors and optical subsystems.

First of all, the company’s keynote, presented by Rotating Chairman, Guo Ping, was focused on Huawei’s views towards the US efforts to thwart Huawei.  The Chairman complained about the year-ago Entity List actions, and then more about this week’s escalation of prohibitions against Huawei.  Huawei expects these US actions will negatively impact Huawei in the future.  It said it is ramping up R&D and is focusing on open standards.  It says US’s efforts will hurt US interests.  In the past year, Huawei says it has redesigned over 1,000 circuit boards and that it grew R&D 30% last year.  Huawei’s supply chain is not “closed off, but open than ever,” and it “will continue to diversify” its base of suppliers.  As a result of US restrictions, the company fell $12B short of its plan in 2019.  Huawei’s view is that it simply hopes to “survive” in 2020.  One key message from the keynote was that Huawei does not want to see a world with two standards and two supply chains for the communications industry.

The company’s big news, in our view, was that it is advocating for F5G, which is a variant on PON technology that could be used in nearly all parts of networks, from indoor enterprise, to residential and business last mile, to cellular backhaul/fronthaul, and so on.  The vision, which was shared by co-sponsor, ETSI, a standards body in the telecom marketplace.  We think Huawei’s goal of creating a single technology platform that can be used in various markets where today multiple standards exist could be a good one.  For instance, in campus LAN environments, one could certainly argue that copper-based Ethernet has run its course (our forecasts are for declining revenue), and in the “last mile,” 1G-class PON and its currently shipping successor, 10G PON will need to be replaced by something.  F5G, which would operate at 10 Gbps and 50 Gbps speeds, differs from another consortium’s approach to a 10G PON successor, which operates at 25G.  So, on the one hand, Huawei is entering the market with a big idea – to put the same kind of fiber system “everywhere” (to the home, in the business, to the cellular towers, for instance) – at a time when many of these markets are currently, or soon will be, undergoing a transition, is a good idea.  On the other hand, there are already other standards bodies working to create accepted approaches for “to the home” fiber at 25 Gbps, for “in the business” at 2.5/5 Gbps, 10 Gbps, 25 Gbps and 100 Gbps (some copper, some fiber), and “to the towers” at 25 Gbps, 50 Gbps and 100 Gbps.  If Huawei gets it way, and F5G succeeds to become a standards, while at the same time the other standards continue to progress as they are today, then we’ll end up with two standards, the Huawei/ETSI approach, and the other approaches used by BBF, IEEE, etc.  This is what Huawei said it is trying to avoid in the keynote.

We enjoyed Huawei’s perspectives about its experience in the Chinese mobile and fixed market, where we see increasingly Chinese vendors are serving an increasing portion of capital equipment needs, while at the same time, it was interesting to hear about how the company is taking its experiences to other markets like Europe, Middle East, Asia and Latin America.  Several topics it discussed that were important, in our view, were the importance of mmWave, FDD+TDD integration, and CUPS.  To review each, we thought it was interesting that Huawei continues to view that the mmWave frequency as being limited to a US-only 5G market implementation; it views the C-band (which is mid-band) as the main spectrum where 5G will be deployed around the world, and it thinks this is sufficient to achieve 5G’s goals.  Next, the company spent ample time discussing its RAN technology that allows both TDD and FDD to operate simultaneously, explaining that FDD is best suited for lower frequencies and allows for superior uplink capabilities, while TDD is best for mid-band and is well-suited for MU-MIMO, high capacity throughput radios.  The company also shared that its CUPS technology has been adopted by 60 customers, which represents significant progress.
​
We are eager to see the standards “battle” resolved, whether that means Huawei works closely with existing standards bodies, or whether other players worldwide, get on board with F5G, so that the communications industry will benefit from volume shipments and consumers may benefit with lower prices and new technology getting deployed sooner.
0 Comments

    CHRIS DePUY
    &
    Alan weckel

    Technology Analysts

    Archives

    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017

    Categories

    All
    100 Gbps
    10 Gbps Ethernet
    112 Gbps SERDES
    12.8 Tbps
    14.4 Tbps
    200 Gbps
    2.4 GHz
    25G PON
    25GS-PON
    28 Ghz
    3.5 GHz
    3GPP
    400 Gbps
    50 Gbps
    50 Gbps SERDES
    50G PON
    56 Gbps SERDES
    5.925
    5G
    5G Americas
    5G Core
    5G Fixed Wireless Access
    5 Ghz
    5G Taxi
    600 Mhz
    60 GHz
    6G
    6 GHz
    7.125
    800 G
    800 Gbps
    802.11ac
    802.11ad
    802.11ah
    802.11ax
    802.11ay
    900 MHz
    A3
    Accelleran
    Actility
    ACX6360
    ADC
    Aerohive
    AFA
    AFC
    AFF A800
    Affirmed Networks
    AI
    AIops
    Airframe
    Air Pass
    Airspan
    Alan Weckel
    Alcatel
    Alcatel Lucent Enterprise
    Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise
    Alibaba
    All Flash Array
    Altiostar
    Amazon
    AMD
    AMIT Wireless
    Amplifi
    Analytics
    AOI
    AP530
    AP550
    Apple
    Apstra
    Aptilo
    Aquto
    Arista
    ARM
    Arris
    Artificial Intelligence
    Ascend 310
    ASR 9000
    Asset Tracking
    ASUS
    Atlas 200
    ATM19
    ATMDigital
    Atmosphere
    AT&T
    Automation
    Avaya
    AWS
    Azure
    Backhaul
    Baicells
    Bai Cells
    Baidu
    Balong
    BEC Technologies
    BELL
    BGP
    Big Switch
    BIS
    BLE
    BLE5
    BLE Beacon
    BLINQ
    Bluetooth
    Boingo
    Borje Ekholm
    Broadband
    Broadcom
    BT
    Bureau Of Industry And Security
    Cable Modem
    Cambium
    Campus Switch
    Campus Switching
    Capex
    Carrier
    Cat 6500
    Catalyst 9000
    C-Band
    CBRS
    CDN
    Celeno
    Centurytel
    CEOS
    Charter Communications
    Chatbot
    Check Point Software
    China Mobile
    China Telecom
    China Unicom
    Chungwa Telecom
    Ciena
    Cisco
    Cisco ICE
    Clearpass
    Cloud
    Cloud Managed
    Cloud-managed
    Cloud RAN
    Cloud Volumes
    Cognitive Wi-Fi
    Coherent Pluggable
    Comba
    Comcast
    Common Networks
    Commscope
    Consolidation
    Consumer Mesh
    Contact Tracing
    Contrail
    Co-packaged Optics
    Corning
    Coronavirus
    Corvid-19
    CoSP
    COVID-19
    CPaaS
    CPE
    CPRI
    Cradlepoint
    Crosswork
    CSCF
    CSP
    Cumulus
    CUPS
    CX 6200
    CyberX
    Dark Reading
    Dartmouth
    DAS
    Data Center
    DCI
    DD QSFP
    DD-QSFP
    DDR4
    DELL
    Delta
    Deutsche Bank
    Deutsche Telekom
    D-Link
    DOCOMO
    DOCSIS
    DPDK
    DRAM
    Dropbox
    ECI Telecom
    Edgecore
    Eero
    EMC
    ENAC
    Encore
    Entity List
    EPC
    EPON
    Ericsson
    Ericsson Router 6000
    ESP
    Etheric
    Ethernet
    Ethernet Switch
    ETSI
    Europe
    Extreme
    Extreme Networks
    F5
    F5G
    Facebook
    FBOSS
    FCC
    Federated Wireless
    Fibre Channel
    Firewall
    Fixed Wireless Access
    Flash
    FMS
    Forescout
    Fortinet
    FP-4
    FPGA
    Fronthaul
    Fujitsu
    FWA
    GAA
    Gainspeed
    GENBAND
    Geofencing
    German Edge Cloud
    Google
    GPON
    GPU
    Greenlake
    H3C
    HAS2018
    HAS2019
    HAS2020
    HDD
    Hong Kong Broadband
    Hotspot Tracking
    HPE
    HPE Aruba
    Huawei
    HWMBBF
    Hyperconverged
    Hyperscaler
    IaaS
    IBM
    ICD
    IMS
    Infinera
    Innoeye
    Intel
    IoT
    IoT Control Center
    Ip Access
    Italtel
    ITU-T SG 15
    Ixia
    John Roy
    Juniper
    Junos
    Kandy
    KDDI
    Keerti Melkote
    Keysight
    KT
    KUIPER
    Kungpeng
    LAA
    Las Vegas
    Layer123
    LG Electronics
    LG UPlus
    Linux
    Location Based Service
    LoRa
    LTE
    LTE-U
    Lucent
    Machine Learning
    MACSec
    Managed Services
    MANO
    Marco Rubio
    Marvell
    Massive MIMO
    Mavenir
    MaxLinear
    MEC
    Mediatek
    Megafon
    Meraki
    Mesh WiFi
    Metro Optical
    Michael P. O'Reilly
    Microsoft
    Midband
    Mid-market
    Millimeter Wave
    Millimeter-wave
    Mist
    Mist Systems
    Mixing Bauds
    MmWave
    Mobile
    Mobile Edge Computing
    Mobile RAN
    Modem-E
    Mojo Networks
    Motorola
    Motorola Solutions
    MPLS
    MSO
    Multefire
    MultiGig
    Multi Gig
    MultiTech
    MU MIMO
    MU-MIMO
    MWC
    MWC18
    MWC19
    MWC20
    MWCa
    MX
    NBASE T
    NBASE-T
    Nbn
    NCS 5700
    NEC
    NEC 540
    NetApp
    Netcracker
    Netgear
    NetInsight
    Netskope
    Network Services Orchestrator
    Network Slicing
    Neville Ray
    Newracomm
    New Radio
    NFV
    Nokia
    Nortel
    NPU
    NTT
    NUWAVE
    NVMe
    NVMeoFC
    OCP
    Ocp2019
    Ocpsummit
    OFC
    #OFC18
    Ofcom
    OFDMA
    OIF
    OLT
    OmniXtend
    ONAP
    ONFConnect
    OnGo
    On Semiconductor
    ONT
    Ooka
    Open19
    OpenRAN
    Open RAN
    OPPO
    Optical
    Optical LAN
    OptiXtreme H6
    Optus
    Oracle
    ORAN
    Orange
    Oreedoo
    OSFP
    OSS/BSS
    OTAC
    P2P
    P4
    Packet Optical
    PAL
    Parallel Wireless
    Passpoint
    PON
    Posture Assessment
    Private LTE
    Project Denali
    PSE 3
    PSE-3
    PTX
    Pure Storage
    Quad Level Cell
    Qualcomm
    Quanta
    Quantenna
    Quillion
    Radio Resource Management
    Rakuten
    RAN
    RBBN
    RCP
    RCS
    Realtek
    Reefshark
    Ribbon
    RISC
    Riverbed
    Rivet Networks
    ROADM
    Robin.io
    Rostelecom
    Router
    Ruckus
    Samsung
    Sandisk
    SAS
    SASE
    Satellite
    SBC
    SD Branch
    SD-Branch
    SDN
    SD-RAN
    SDWAN
    SD WAN
    SD-WAN
    Security
    Semtech
    Sequans
    Sercomm
    Server
    Shaw Communications
    Siemens
    Sierra Wireless
    Silver Peak
    Single-pane
    SingleRAN
    SingleRAN Pro
    SIP Trunking
    SK Telecom
    Skype
    Small Cell
    Smartphone
    Snapdragon 865
    Softbank
    Sonus
    Spark
    Spectrum
    Sprint
    Sp Router
    SRX
    SSD
    StandAlone
    Starlink
    STC
    Stellar
    Swisscom
    Tago.io
    Tareq Amin
    Technicolor
    Telco Cloud
    Telecom Infra Project
    Telefonica
    Telia
    Telit
    Telus
    Tencent
    Terragraph
    Tiangang
    T-Mobile
    TMUS
    Tomahawk 3
    TP-Link
    T&W
    Twilio
    Twitter
    TWT
    Ubiquiti
    UCaaS
    UCPE
    UI
    UltraSAW
    UniFi
    Unified Domain Center
    Unlicensed
    UTM
    UXI-6
    VaporIO
    VBLE
    VDSL
    VEPC
    Verilog
    Verizon
    Versa Networks
    VICTOR
    Virtualization
    VNF
    Vodafone
    VoLTE
    VRAN
    VSBC
    Walt Disney
    Wan Optimization
    Water Tower Research
    Way Finder
    WDC
    Westell
    Western Digital
    Western Digital Corporation
    WFH
    White Box
    White Paper
    Wi-F 6E
    WiFi
    Wi-Fi
    Wi-Fi 6
    WiFi 6
    WiFi-6
    Wi-Fi 6E
    WiFi Alliance
    WiFiNOW
    WiGig
    Wind River
    WISP
    WLAN
    Xiaomi
    Xilinx
    Xirrus
    XRAN
    Zebra
    Zero-Rating
    Zero Trust
    Zigbee
    Zipline
    ZR
    ZR+
    ZScaler
    ZTE
    Zyxel

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Programs
    • WLAN Infrastructure
    • Telecom Core Networks
    • Ethernet Switch Programs >
      • Ethernet Switch - Total
      • Ethernet Switch - Data Center
      • Ethernet Switch - Campus
      • Ethernet Switch - Carrier Ethernet
      • Campus Networks
      • Ethernet Switch - SMB
    • Application Delivery Controller (ADC)
    • Merchant Silicon in the Data Center
    • Market Intelligence Reports
    • Consumer IoT
    • Disaggregated Routing Report
    • Industrial Switching Report
    • Multi-Cloud Workloads Forecast and Research Report
    • Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Forecast and Research Report
    • Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Hyperscaler SWOT Report
  • News
    • Press Releases
  • Blog
  • About
  • Employment
  • Contact
  • Clients